Question about something I saw in the ISXEQ2 Release Notes

[mistahmikey]

As I was looking through these notes, I noticed the following:

December 22, 2011 -- By Amadeus
[20111221.0012]
* Fixed the "ToItem" MEMBER of the item, merchandise, and consignment datatypes

I was surprised to see this, not only because it is not documented on the ISXEQ2 wiki, but because I have been interested in being able to turn a consignment into a full item for quite a while (reference the bug report I filed about the ExamineItemWindow a couple of months ago). Unfortunately, when I tried to access this member using Vendor.Item[${itemNumber}].ToItem, I get a runtime error saying the member "ToItem" does not exist.

So.

Is the referenced quote a typo? Or am I somehow not understanding how to access this member?

Thanks.

 

[CyberTech]

As I was looking through these notes, I noticed the following:



I was surprised to see this, not only because it is not documented on the ISXEQ2 wiki, but because I have been interested in being able to turn a consignment into a full item for quite a while (reference the bug report I filed about the ExamineItemWindow a couple of months ago). Unfortunately, when I tried to access this member using Vendor.Item[${itemNumber}].ToItem, I get a runtime error saying the member "ToItem" does not exist.

So.

Is the referenced quote a typo? Or am I somehow not understanding how to access this member?

Thanks.

lstype item
lstype consignment
lstype merchandise

lstype -list

It's a very useful command

 

[mistahmikey]

After using the suggested command, I see that there is no ToItem member provided for any of the types referenced in the quote - so I guess it must have been a typo where ToLink was meant instead?

It appears the ability to turn a consignment into a full item just doesn't exist (or at least doesn't work), even though turning an item into a consignment is supported. Is there some reason for this?

Also, while the lstype command is better than nothing I suppose, I was unable to find any way to have it display return types or parameters. Is there some way to do this too? Just knowing there is a method/member is somewhat helpful, but if you don't have the rest of the information when its not documented on the wiki, not much you can do with that information.